...it turns out that in Denmark, which is considered one of the model countries for traffic safety, it can take 10–15 years from the birth of a new idea to its implementation. Essentially, this means that such a timeframe is normal for infrastructure development in large cities, because one cannot try to solve problems that have been accumulating for years in one or two seasons, and moreover, do it all with temporary traffic management measures. Several things have been implemented in Riga that we can view positively, and bollards can also be good, yet I would like to see works being carried out just as actively to rebuild or improve problem areas with permanent solutions. In my opinion, there is currently a distinct lack of targeted action, including stating clearly: this is what we can afford right now, but we cannot afford that, as there are not enough funds for everything. Perhaps there is also a lack of courage under these circumstances to tell certain social groups that specific things are currently impossible or not worth implementing, while at the same time providing well-reasoned explanations for the reasons.
Latest articles
Poll
In recent weeks, both in the Saeima and the Cabinet of Ministers, the thesis has been heard once again: “We must act this way, otherwise there will be penalties, infringement procedures, etc.” Often, such a pseudo-argument completely excludes reasonable disputes, discussions, or alternatives, forcing those responsible to make decisions hastily and not always in the interests of Latvia. Why is that?
Old habits are hardening - someone somewhere knows better, let us rely on them
Lack of sufficient capacity or laziness to defend a different point of view
A generation of cabinet officials has been created who are accustomed to accepting rather than delving into matters
This is a serious problem for Latvia for which no solution is being sought. It will probably be all right somehow...
Politicians should not interfere in the work of professionals



