Is a wooden wind turbine farm possible? A Swedish start-up is making clean energy even cleaner - Zeme un valsts

Is a wooden wind turbine farm possible? A Swedish start-up is making clean energy even cleaner

A Swedish start-up is manufacturing wind turbine towers from wood, reducing CO emissions. Wind energy is a crucial element in the energy system decarbonisation process, but as is well known, wind turbine structures also use materials that generate significant carbon dioxide emissions, such as steel.

Swedish start-up Modvion is drawing on Scandinavian expertise to tackle this problem by installing wooden towers. The world's tallest wooden wind turbine tower was recently unveiled near Gothenburg, in south-west Sweden. The 150-metre-tall structure features a two-megawatt generator, providing enough clean energy to power almost 400 homes.

Is wood a good alternative to using steel in wind turbine towers?

Steel is the most commonly used material for wind turbine towers to date, favoured for its strength and durability. As towers become taller, the logistics of their installation become more complex. The massive metal components are heavy and difficult to transport. Tall steel towers require extra reinforcement. Modvion laminated timber towers are manufactured from modules that are easy to load onto trucks; they do not require reinforcement.

Because wooden towers have a higher strength-to-weight ratio, the structures are lighter and easier to assemble. Components of the wooden towers are also bonded with glue, as opposed to the thousands of bolts required for steel towers, which also need regular inspection. A layer of waterproof paint protects the wooden tower from the effects of the weather.

Modvion points out that (when assessed over time) wooden towers cost less than steel towers. For instance, a major advantage is the greater potential height of wooden towers, and they are also “protected” from steel price fluctuations. So far, Modvion has only installed wooden towers on land. With minor adjustments, they could also be used offshore.

Theoretically, wooden towers could be built up to 1,500 metres tall, while current “demand for height” hovers around 150-200 metres.

How do you compare the emissions of steel versus wooden wind turbine towers?

Data from Modvion shows that a 110-metre-tall steel wind turbine generates approximately 1,250 tonnes of CO over its life cycle. For a wooden tower, emissions are 90% lower – approximately 125 tonnes.

When the wooden towers reach the end of their service life, they can subsequently be used in construction as high-strength beams, both extending the use of the timber and further reducing the impact generated.

“We like to view our towers as a vertical storage of future building materials,” states Modvion. The company estimates that building wind turbine towers from wood reduces the emissions generated by wind power plants by approximately 30% per kWh produced. One tower requires 300-1,200 m³ of timber. Modvion uses spruce grown in Scandinavia from sustainably managed forests, where the volume of forest regrowth exceeds the volume of logging.

https://www.euronews.com/green/2023/12/29/can-you-make-a-wind-farm-out-of-wood-meet-the-swedish-start-up-making-clean-energy-even-gr

Comments

Ainārs
Ja jau pie Geteborgas ir uzbūvēts, tad inženieri ir rēķinājuši tehniskos parametrus. Domāju, ka tagad arī praksē uzzināsim vairāk par to izturību. Savukārt, ja kāds granulu ražotājs ir gatavs par dārgu naudu pirkt zāģbaļķus, lai no tiem ražotu granulas, tad neredzu iemeslu kāpēc neļaut viņam bankrotēt.
Staņislavs
Ļoti laba doma! Ražot vēja turbīnu torņus no koka. Ekoloģiski tīrs produkts ,rada 10 reizes mazāk emisiju. Bet kā ir ar lieces izturību un pārejiem tehniskiem parametriem kurus jānodrošina vēja turbīnām!!!
Arturs
Paldies par info! Droši vien tomēr 1,5 km augstus torņus nebūvēs :) kā minēts tekstā. Galvenais jautājums, vai centieni mazināt fosilā kurināmā izmantošanu nenovedīs pie vēl pastiprinātākas mežu izciršanas. Šobrīd, jai koki tiek cirsti granulu ražošanai globālā mērogā. Vai neiebrauksim otrā grāvī intensificējot globālo mežu likvidēšanu ? Jāšaubās vai un kā varētu sagaidīt kādu kompetentu izvērtējumu bez komerciālām interesēm ?

Add a comment