Answers to unanswered questions from the conference - Zeme un valsts

Answers to unanswered questions from the conference

Uldis Valainis

Do you not think that the new European Green Deal will wipe out FSC and PEFC certification? At least in Europe.

The Green Deal could indirectly, and perhaps predictably, even lead to an increase in the number of FSC and PEFC certified companies (both FM and CoC), as national-level requirements are likely to become stricter than the regulatory framework of FSC and PEFC regarding nature conservation requirements. Therefore, for certified companies, this will no longer create additional burdens or restrictions compared to non-certified companies. There are certain risks to the FSC and PEFC certification systems regarding plans for developing alternative forest certification systems in Europe; however, it must be noted that requirements regarding the demand for certified timber are determined by consumers who, in my understanding, will not be prepared to pay a higher price. Alternative forest certification systems will only be able to exist if the European Union subsidises such systems, because otherwise, they will not be able to ensure competitive prices for certified timber compared to the FSC and PEFC certification systems.

How do you assess the criteria for identifying habitats - do they allow for a low threshold to classify mature large trees as a habitat?
 
For every type of EU-protected habitat found in Latvia, minimum criteria have been developed; if these are met, the specific area can be recognised as an EU-protected habitat. The methodology for identifying the distribution and quality of EU-protected habitats and organising the work was coordinated and approved by the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development (VARAM) in its order dated 22 July 2016. The criteria are individual for each habitat type, but generally, the presence of biologically old trees in a forest stand is only one of a few criteria used to recognise a specific forest stand as an EU-protected forest habitat. Usually, the presence of large-dimension dead wood (fallen logs, stumps, standing dead trees), the processes and functions occurring within the forest stand, and the presence of species characteristic of the specific habitat type are also of significant importance. For certain forest habitat types, the most significant criterion is not the structure of the forest stand, but the geomorphology of the site – for example, forests on aeolian deposits, esker-like landforms, etc.
 
Āris Jansons
 
What will be the economic losses to the forestry sector from uncontrolled climate change that awaits us if we do not address this problem with sufficient activity?

This question cannot be answered with a simple 'yes' or 'no', as it depends on the degree to which the impact on climate change (and consequently the changes themselves) is not curbed. However, in our region, unlike, for example, Southern Europe, the impact would be relatively smaller and could be reduced by carrying out targeted adaptation measures, such as increasing resistance to storms (lower stand density, tended young stands, management based on target diameter, potential reduction in the spread of root rot and bark damage caused by ungulates, volume reduction) and increasing resistance to other negative factors by making wider use of planting material adapted to the future climate.

How do Silava scientists assess the forestry sector's ability to transfer research results into practice to achieve the sector's goals?

Scientists do not assess this ability; scientists promote this transfer by telling everyone willing to listen about research results and findings that can be used in practice. So far, on quite a number of issues, we have managed to find a receptive audience both at Latvijas valsts meži and among individual private forest owners who are happy to hear the results, for example, regarding regeneration by planting, selective breeding, small-scale forestry machinery, soil preparation in mounds, etc.

Add a comment